<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Peer Review on ARJ (English)</title>
    <link>https://www.arj.no/tags/peer-review/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Peer Review on ARJ (English)</description>
    
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.128.2</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <copyright>Alexander Refsum Jensenius. CC-BY-SA 4.0</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.arj.no/tags/peer-review/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Peer Review is Killing Science</title>
      <link>https://www.arj.no/2024/10/19/peer-review-problems/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.arj.no/2024/10/19/peer-review-problems/</guid>
      <description>I write about how peer review is currently ruining the scientific system.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Different Publication Cultures</title>
      <link>https://www.arj.no/2023/05/07/publication-culture/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 May 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.arj.no/2023/05/07/publication-culture/</guid>
      <description>At we have several different disciplines working together The three core disciplines at RITMO are musicology psychology and informatics In addition we...</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why I Don&#39;t Review for Elsevier Journals</title>
      <link>https://www.arj.no/2021/12/21/no-elsevier-reviewing/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.arj.no/2021/12/21/no-elsevier-reviewing/</guid>
      <description>This blog post is written to have a URL to send to Elsevier editors that ask me to review for their journals I have declined to review for Elsevier...</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More research should be solid instead of novel</title>
      <link>https://www.arj.no/2021/09/20/solid-research/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.arj.no/2021/09/20/solid-research/</guid>
      <description>Novelty is often highlighted as the most important criterion for getting research funding That a manuscript is novel is also a major concern for many...</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Double blind peer review</title>
      <link>https://www.arj.no/2010/09/04/double-blind-peer-review/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.arj.no/2010/09/04/double-blind-peer-review/</guid>
      <description>Many journals and a few conferences operate with a so called double blind peer review policy This means that the reviewers of the paper wont get to know...</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
