NotebookLM

I find Google’s NotebookLM to be one of the most powerful tools for researchers these days. Its core function is to work with the material you upload. Hence, it differs from ChatGPT and other tools that invent things on their own or search the web. It also has many different types of reports, including audio and video. But how accurate is it? Testing NotebookLM To test NotebookLM on some material I know very well, I decided to provide it with a collection of public data about myself, more specifically, what I have registered in the Norwegian NVA system, which is the database we use in Norway to register all our academic activities. This includes academic publications, public lectures, artistic works, interviews, etc. In my case, that contains around 1000 entries dating back to 2000. ...

Over the past few weeks, I have read several newspaper articles and seen numerous social media postings from researchers expressing skepticism about using AI in research. It is fine that some people prefer not to use new tools, but I don’t see why that should hinder the rest of us from exploring the possibilities that are out there. Many researchers do use AI tools, which I think is perfectly fine. The problem is that not many people talk about how they use the tools and reflect more on how they work. I think it is imperative that professors explore AI in various ways to see what works and what does not. After all, we are going to teach upcoming generations and lead the way in both development and use. We then need hands-on experience and qualified opinions. ...